Friday, January 30, 2015

Charles Darwin and “The Monkey’s Uncle”

     
My father was a confirmed believer in evolution, often referring to “our ancestors the fish.” .  By contrast my father-in-law found the idea of a primate ancestor thoroughly disgusting and rejected it, unwilling to believe he descended from “a monkey’s uncle.”  We have a son who is an evolutionary biologist.  Because evolution is a frequent topic of conversation in our household, it seems appropriate to devote a post to Charles Darwin, shown above, whose 206th birthday the world celebrates on February 12.

Although Darwin was a thoughtful, serious scientist who made a monumental breakthrough in human thinking,  his revolutionary ideas were often ridiculed by skeptics and, at the time, made the subject of satirical cartoons and other illustrations.  In many cases, the monkey was at the center of such lampoons.  Darwin himself frequently was depicted as a monkey by cartoonists and illustrators.  

Because, through horrific circumstances, a French satirical magazine has been much in the news of late, I thought it appropriate to begin with a picture of Darwin as a monkey that appeared in 19th Century French publication “La Petite Lune” (The Little Moon).  It shows the scientist as a monkey wearing shorts, a tail over one hairy arm, hanging from a tree labeled “Tree of Science.”  It is believed that this image by artist Andre’ Gill was published about 1871, not long after Darwin had published a major work, “The Descent of Man.”

In that book, Darwin had argued that humans and monkeys share a common ancestors, a conclusion that many found hard to swallow.  The cartoon left portrays Darwin as a money, again with his human head.  He is shown holding up a mirror to a monkey sitting next to him and apparently showing the animal how much they look alike.  Appearing in Figaro’s London Sketch Book of Celebrities in 1874, the caricature was accompanied by two quotations from Shakespeare:  “This is the ape of form,” from Love’s Labor Lost and “Some four or five descents since…” from All’s Well That Ends Well.  Some have seen this as particularly demeaning to Darwin on the grounds that the monkey should be showing the mirror to the scientist, not the other way around.

The next cartoon at left is in the same vein,  Darwin’s head on a monkey body, apparently researching the large and protruding bustle on a tall woman whom he seems to be addressing.  While the message conveyed there is somewhat cloudy, the intent once again is ridicule the British biologist and his theories of human evolution.  Although the cartoons shown above have shown him with more or less human hands and feet, the image right has endowed him with chimpanzee-like digits.  Note that he appears to be grasping in one paw, a scroll.  This is apparently a reference to his writings on the “descent of man.”
Earlier, after the publication of “Origin of Species” by Darwin in 1859 and more particularly an article entitled, “Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms, with Observation of their Habits,”  Punch, the satirical London magazine, in 1882 published on its cover a cartoon that depicts the scientist as ancient sage watching as worms evolved into lizards, lizards into monkeys,  monkeys into sprites and cavemen, culminating in the figure of a British dandy.  Even though the figure of Darwin himself is human and not monkey, the purpose of Linley Tambourine’s cartoon clearly is to ridicule his theory of evolution.
A satire on Darwin could be made into a cartoon puzzle.  Shown here is a picture that contains no fewer than 13 animals in a illustration that accompanied an advertisement for British manufacturer of  boots and shoes. Call the “Monkey’s Tea Party,” the viewer is challenged to find a portrait of Darwin amidst the tumult.  It is not hard.  He can be found upside down on the right center of the picture.  

Spoofing Darwin could be put to mercantile purposes beyond the boot trade in England.  Merchant’s Gargling Oil, sold as fit for man and beast, found a natural foil in Darwin and his theories.   Its Victorian trade card shows a gorilla-like beast pouring the gargling oil on his leg while intoning a quatrain:   “If I am Darwin’s grandpa, It follows, don’t you see, That what is going for man and beast, Is doubly good for me.”  I say old chap, devilishly clever, don’t you think?”
The final cartoon here is a satire on the satires.  It was penned by Chris Madden, a cartoonist whose work is frequently found in the pages of Philosophy Now magazine.  He has copied almost exactly the image of Darwin shown above, put him into tree and added a second figure behind asking “What about me?”  The other man-monkey would appear to be Alfred Russel Wallace, the British scientist who jointly deserves credit with Darwin for conceiving the theory of evolution through natural selection.  Wallace did not face the same level of ridicule as the elder scientist.

We cannot be sure what Darwin’s responses were to these images in his lifetime, but from the perspective of our times we know that the last laugh truly is from the scientist, not his detractors.  Although some elements of his theories of the origins of humankind have been challenged, shown to be flawed, or corrected,  Charles Darwin (with Wallace) were on the right track and he deserves to be ranked among the great thinkers of historical time.












Saturday, January 17, 2015

Beer Inside a Glass -- But No Drinking Please

Certain industries and trades seem to have had a predilection for issuing glass paperweights to advertise their wares.  In the past this blog has featured weights from  ambulance services, steamships, cigar makers, the liquor trade and soft drinks.  Now comes beer.  In reality breweries usually chose other forms of advertising than glass weights, but a few pre-Prohibition beer manufacturers did issue them.  Over the years I have been able to assemble a number of examples to post;  some are from well-known breweries, others from more obscure enterprises. 

The first set are grouped around paperweights that illustrated the breweries themselves.  The first shows the extensive plant of the Philip Best Brewing Company in Milwaukee, a complex  only a few blocks from where once I lived.  By that time, however, it had become the Pabst Brewing Co. The immigrant Best family, led by Jacob Best Sr., founded a brewery on the site shown above. When Jacob retired about 1853, he sold the business to his son, Philip, thus the name on the weight.  A lake boat captain named Capt. Frederick Pabst married Philip’s daughter and in 1866, with Philip’s retirement, took over management of the brewery, eventually changing its name to his own.
The next weight, identified as the yard of the Empire Brewery, shows the fire company, the cooper’s shop and the pitch department. It may also been issued by the Best/Pabst brewing dynasty. The company’s downtown Milwaukee facility was at one time known as the Empire Brewery.   The illustration, however, looks nothing like that facility.  Moreover, there were Empire Breweries not just in Wisconsin, but also in New York and Pennsylvania.  Like the preceding item, this weight can be dated back to the mid- to later 1800s.  Note that all the wagons are horse-drawn.
The third depiction of a brewery is a domed glass weight from another famous beer-maker,  Schlitz.  Joseph Schlitz began his brewing career a a bookkeeper in a tavern brewery owned by August Krug.  After Krug died, Schlitz married his widow and changed the name of the brewery to the Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company.   By 1902 he and his successors had built it into the largest producer of beer in the the United States  When Schlitz died in a ship disaster in 1875, Krug’s nephews took control but kept the name.  The Schlitz complex shown on the weight was located on Milwaukee’s East Side, near the Milwaukee River.
The second set of weights notes a prevalence of horses.  The James Hanley Brewing Co. of Providence, Rhode Island, memorialized Prince Alert, a horse that had set a harness racing record for a mile run.   Hanley had begun his life in commerce as a liquor dealer but about 1877 with a partner he took over an existing Providence brewery.  When the partner died two years later, Hanley carried on.  Circa 1886, he changed the name to the one on the weight.  After time out for Prohibition the company was still in business as late as 1957.
George W. Wiedenmayer featured a horse and rider on a weight, this to advertise his Chevalier Beer.  Wiedenmayer founded his brewery in Newark, New Jersey, in 1878 and it operated for eighteen years, closing in 1896.  That makes it possible to date the item with some precision.  Unlike most of the other glass weights shown here, this one can be identified by maker.  It was the product of the Abrams Paper Weight Co. of Pittsburgh.  That firm had developed a process of two-color printing on glass that made their ads more resistant to the effects of time than those printed on paper.
The Metz Brothers were among the first brewers in the state of Nebraska, having been established in Omaha in 1861, subsequently moving to another, larger site. Their brewery became one of the biggest in town and claimed to have “no equal in the country.”  The Metz brothers also ran a beer hall in Omaha to which the suds were hauled fresh from the brewery by horse cart.  Just why the Metz Bros. chose to show a woman being bucked off a mule for their paperweight is not clear, unless it was to show just those little bits of thigh and bosom.
A third paperweight theme was birds.  The Geo. Walter Brewing Co. of Appleton Wisconsin, featured a duck, a variety that may only have been an artist’s fancy.  Like the family that was responsible for Best/Pabst, the four Walters brothers emigrated from Germany but rejected Milwaukee for upstate Wisconsin which, it is said, reminded them of their home in the Black Forest.  Each of the Walters brothers became involved making beer.  George Walter purchased two adjacent breweries in Appleton and combined them to create his own brewing complex.  The business appears to have ceased with Walter’s death in 1899.
In 1859 the Eagle Brewery was established by John Ebner on Indianapolis Avenue in Vincennes, Illinois.   It operated under his management until 1875 when it was sold to Eugene Hack and Anton Simon.  They kept the name and added an eagle logo identifying their flagship brand.   Hack and Simon successfully operated the brewery for decades.  They were producing 18,000 barrels of beer a year and maintained five wagons and twelve head of horses for their local trade.  In time they established five refrigerated beer depots in towns in Indiana and Illinois.  The brewery was shut down by Indiana prohibitionary laws in 1918 and apparently not reopened in 1934 after Repeal.
The next weight displays wing creatures that are not really birds but mythical beasts called griffins.  They are displayed rampant on a backdrop of barley stalks and hops to advertise the F. Bartels Brewing Co. of Cincinnati, Ohio.  This item can easily be dated since F. Bartels opened in 1898 and closed only two years later.  The suspected cause of this early demise may have been bad beer or just plain bad luck.   Bartels had the misfortune of being one of 84 breweries in the city so that competition was ruthless.  Many of the city’s saloons were tied to one of its breweries and outside brews were not allowed inside those swinging doors.  
John A. McAvoy began his entrepreneurial career running a tannery in South Haven, Michigan.  Having tired of processing hides about 1864, he sold out, moved to Chicago,  and looked for a place to put his cash.  There he met H.V. Bemis who talked him into partnering in a brewery he was establishing at 24th Street and the Lakefront.  They called their enterprise McAvoy & Bemis Brewing. Their flagship beer was McAvoy’s Malt Marrow. I find this beer weight particularly interesting because despite its age, it has retained its bright multi-colors.  Note too the boy with a dog holding a bottle:  In those days kids sold beer. 
The final object in this showcase is a solid blown glass weight from the C. L. Centlivre Brewing Co. of Fort Wayne, Indiana.  An enterprising Frenchman from Alsace, Centlivre built his brewery on the banks of the St. Joseph River. a mile north of the city.  Improving and enlarging those works from year to year by 1880 he was employing twenty workers and could turn out 15,000 barrels a year.  An 1889 fire destroyed his bottling plant and adjacent boat house but Centlivre quickly rebuilt “on a magnificent scale,” according to a contemporary account.  His facility was known to residents of Fort Wayne as “the French brewery.”

There they are, eleven paperweights in a wide variety of motifs.  Some remind us of those pre-Prohibition days when even small cities and towns, like Appleton, Fort Wayne, and Vincennes  could boast a local brewery, turning out fresh lagers and ales for the locals.  And sometimes rewarding customers with beer under a glass — not in it.












  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Remembering Robert Service on His 104th Birthday

              
Who is this man, Robert W. Service, that his portrait and name should be emblazoned on the label of a Canadian beer bottle and repeated on a bar coaster?   Why would an English-born bank clerk, wannabe cowboy, and cat house gofer be so honored?  The answer to this rhetorical question:  Because he wrote two of the best loved poems in the English language.   

Robert William Service, whose 140th birthday we celebrate on January 16 of this year, began life in Preston, Lancashire, moving to Scotland as a child where eventually he was employed in a Scottish bank.  Struck with wanderlust, when he was 21 he traveled to British Columbia, Canada, reputedly owning a Buffalo Bill outfit and dreams of becoming a cowboy.  Shown here in maturity, Service drifted around North America, living in Mexico, California (site of the bordello) and returned to Canada where he found work as a teller in a Vancouver bank.
All the time Service was writing verses.  It was only when his bank sent him to the Whitehorse branch in the Yukon, however, that he found his true calling.  Whitehorse was a frontier town, less than 10 years old.  Located on the Yukon River, the settlement had begun as a camp for the prospectors on their way to join the great Klondike Gold Rush of the late 1890s.  Service’s housing became rustic cabins in the forest.   Although the mining fever had subsided and mired in the stolid world of banking, the poet listened avidly to stories of that wild and rowdy time and dreamed of having participated.
Returning from a walk one night, Service heard the sounds of revelry from a saloon, and the phrase, "A bunch of the boys were whooping it up" popped into his head. Inspired, he ran back to the bank to write it down (reputedly almost being shot for a burglar).  By the next morning "The Shooting of Dan McGrew” was complete:
A bunch of the boys were whooping it up in the Malamute saloon;
The kid that handles the music-box was hitting a jag-time tune;
Back of the bar, in a solo game, sat Dangerous Dan McGrew,
And watching his luck was his light-o'-love, the lady that's known as Lou.

This poem has inspired many illustrations, re-printings and even a play or two since it was penned since it was written well more than a century below.  My Father, for whom it was a favorite piece of verse, could recite it from memory, often with dramatic embellishments to an audience of youngsters.  In a low growl he would intone the final words of the menacing stranger who had entered the saloon:  But I want to state, and my words are straight, and I'll bet my poke they're true,That one of you is a hound of hell . . . and that one is Dan McGrew.”  No matter how many times I heard him recite that line, it never failed to give me goosebumps.

It was only about a month later that Service wrote the second poem that would make him world famous.  He heard a Gold Rush story from a Dawson miner about a man who cremated his companion in the Yukon cold.  The yarn fevered the young bank clerk’s imagination and he spent the the night walking and composing the verses in his head.  The next morning he wrote it down from memory and called it the “Cremation of Sam McGee”:

There are strange things done in the midnight sun
By the men who moil for gold;
The Arctic trails have their secret tales
 That would make your blood run cold;
The Northern Lights have seen queer sights,
 But the queerest they ever did see
Was that night on the marge of Lake Lebarge
 I cremated Sam McGee.

My Father also could make this poem come alive in his rendition.  He made you feel the misery of the Southerner, Sam, in the cold Arctic air “moiling for gold.”  Before he dies Sam makes his mining pal promise to cremate him.   To keep the promise that miner finds a suitable place in a derelict ship rotting on the shores of the icy Lake Lebarge.  He stokes the boiler and stuffs in Sam’s body:
Then I made a hike, for I didn't like to hear him sizzle so;
And the heavens scowled, and the huskies howled, and the wind began to blow.
It was icy cold, but the hot sweat rolled down my cheeks, and I don't know why;
And the greasy smoke in an inky cloak went streaking down the sky.

Father’s recitation from memory made these lines particularly dramatic, drawing out the zzz’s in “sizzle” to elicit shudders as did his dwelling on the phrase, “greasy smoke in an inky cloak.”  It was almost like being there.  Despite the lugubriousness of the earlier lines, Service’s poem ends on a humorous note, as the narrator looks into the flames to see what has happened:

And there sat Sam, looking cool and calm, in the heart of the furnace roar;
And he wore a smile you could see a mile, and he said: "Please close that door.
It's fine in here, but I greatly fear you'll let in the cold and storm—
Since I left Plumtree, down in Tennessee, it's the first time I've been warm.”

My Father always addressed those lines with a smile and pronounced “calm” as “ca’m” such as a Yukon miner might.  Many more famous people, like Johnny Cash, have been recorded reciting “The Cremation of Sam McGee,”  but I will always remember my Dad’s stirring rendition. 

It was Service’s own father who was responsible for his poetic fame.   When Robert had collected enough poems he sent them to his senior, who was then living in Toronto.  He wanted a few booklets published for friends.  The elder Service gave them to a local publisher who immediately saw their commercial value and printed them as “Songs of a Sourdough.”

Service’s book was an instant hit with the public, meriting multiple printings in Canada, the United States and England.  The London publisher went through 23 printings by 1910 and 13 more by 1917.  The poet eventually earned in excess of $100,000 (equivalent to $2.5 million today) from just this one book, published in the U.S. under the title, “The Spell of the Yukon and Other Verses.” Service’s poetic works never achieved literary approval and were often disdained by the critics.  He himself called them simply “verse.”

Robert Service pursued a variety of interesting activities during his 84 years, including publishing novels, articles and many more poems, but it was the burst of creativity that he achieved in a two month period in Whitehorse that have caused him to be quoted and remembered year after year.  It is amazing how quickly he composed the two poems.  He himself said about “Dan McGrew”: "For it came so easy to me in my excited state that I was amazed at my facility. It was as if someone was whispering in my ear.” Remember too this was just after someone had tried to shoot him.  Service continued: "As I wrote stanza after stanza, the story seemed to evolve itself. It was a marvelous experience. Before I crawled into my bed at five in the morning, my ballad was in the bag.”
Devoted fans who want to visit the home place of Robert Service in Scotland can see a memorial, shown here, one that the poet  himself erected to his family in Kilwinning, Scotland, where he was born.  Service, however, lies buried elsewhere.  In his latter years he and his wife lived in France where he died in September 1858.  Shown here is Service’s gravestone in the village cemetery of Lancieux in Brittany.  Unlike his creation, Sam McGee, he was not cremated.

























Thursday, December 11, 2014

Christmas Flasks and Spirits of the Season — Revisited


 For the last Holiday Season, this blog featured a distinct sub-category of collectible pre-Prohibition bottles known as “Merry Christmas flasks.”  These were glass containers that traditionally were given away by distillers and whiskey dealers at Christmas and New Years to favored customers, be they saloonkeepers, bartenders or frequent retail patrons.  Many of these were “label under glass” (“L.U.G.”), items that today fetch considerable prices.

The first shown left is a label under glass example, a variant on one shown last year.  These were generic, that is, they were produced by a glass company and marketed through catalogues to organizations and individuals in the liquor trade.  This one would have had a small paper label attached, probably on the bottom front that identified the giver.   Those tend to get washed off or otherwise lost as the Merry Christmas flasks age.  This one is likely over 100 years old and has achieved “antique” status.
Not all holiday flasks were as innocuous as Christmas card images.   Following are several that approached the season with humor.  The first, a L.U.G. bottle,  lacks identification indicating a long lost paper tag had once adhered.  Because the label is under glass the image has survived more than a century.  The bedraggled but smiling soldier at right likely is a reference to the Spanish-American war, dating it to about 1898.  The motto below reads:  “But you ought to see the other fellow,”  probably noting the military victory American forces had achieved over the Spanish.  

It cost more for a liquor organization to put its own name on a bottle under the glass, as M.J. Millers’ Sons have done above left, depicting a bartender in a white apron about to open a bottle of rye whiskey dated 1891.  The motto below identifies the contents as “corking good stuff.”  The label identifies the company as “Wholesale and Retail, Liquor Dealers, Westernport, Md.” Farmer Melky (Melchior) Miller founded his distillery about 1875 near Accident, Maryland. In 1902 he sold the business to his three sons, William, John, and Charles.  They became known for the creative design of the jugs and bottles in which they marketed their products.  This flask is indicative. 
Many Christmas flasks were provided with a paper label.  Few of these would survive the vagaries of time, leaving the bottle plain and no clue as to its initial use.  The label on the bottle shown here is in general good condition with a just a bit of damage to the left top.  Like the two prior bottles, this one had a bit of mischief.  The boy must have had a full bladder since he has been able to write extensively in the snow to wish us a “A Merry Christmas + a Happy New Year,” as his dog looked on.  This flask bears the identification of Dan Longbrake, a liquor dealer from Lake View, Ohio, a suburb of Cleveland. 

The next flask, top left, is also bears a slightly damaged paper label, one that depicts a strange Christmas scene.  It appears to be a Father Christmas (or Santa Claus) looking back over his shoulder at a large two-masted sailing ship apparently about to sink in heavy seas.  Not the most merry of holiday illustrations.  The label identifies Joseph Horter in Zanesville, Ohio as the benefactor.  Horter appears to have been a immigrant from France.  Perhaps the label reflects his ocean travel to the United States.
A more festive image was projected by the following flask.  Its paper label was dominated by a clown figure whose red mouth seems to be calling out “Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.”  It bears no identification as the did the prior two flasks.  But the space left under the two wreaths indicates that it was a “generic,” image, available for printing the name and address of the giver.
This flask, like others shown here, would have held anywhere from a full half pint to a few swallows of whiskey.   The mini-flask at left would have given little refreshment.      

Although paper labels are vulnerable, embossed glass can endure well through time.  The bottle shown below left is unusual for its cone shape.  Its design encompasses the greeting with a wreath.  It has a bow at top and a line of four leaf clovers around the sides.  Another wreath embellished the second second flask.  This wreath appears to approximate olive branches. 
Although the final example shown below does not qualify as a flask, it still wishes us a “Merry Christmas.  It is a bail-top ceramic mini-jug that has been identified as having been issued for Four Roses whiskey.  This brand was originated in Atlanta, Georgia, by the renowned whiskey man, Rufus Rose.  The brand later was revived and made nationally known by Paul Jones from his Louisville, Kentucky, distillery.  Jones, it is reported, once had been a salesman for Rufus. 

These Merry Christmas flasks, even taken together with the ones presented in this blog last year, are just few of the the many that exist.  As with last year,  my thanks go to John Pastor, the owner and editor of the Antique Bottle and Glass Collector magazine for providing his readers each Christmas with images of these interesting bottles from his and other collections.  Several  of them are reproduced here.  John has urged anyone with an unusual Christmas flask to be in touch with him, if possible send a picture, and perhaps it can be included in the article he intends next year.  It is something to look forward to.  




  











Friday, December 5, 2014

Predicting the Future: “One Hundred Years Hence”

Time was during the 1970s, I was enamored of the “Futurists,”  pundits who were keen on telling us what the future of the United States and the world would be like.   I eagerly read many books on the subject but gradually wearied of the rampant speculation.  It reminded me how rut-bound the thinking often is behind such projections as the result of perusing a series of trade cards called “One Hundred Years Hence,” issued about 1900 by the Maher & Grosh Cutlery Company of my home town, Toledo, Ohio. 
The cards purported to show the wonders that would greet Americans by the year 2000.  Several of the predictions have been, in fact, realized.  Others bear a slim resemblance to 20th Century inventions — but not as depicted.   A third group appear utterly absurd from a contemporary perspective.  Unfortunately, none of the folks responsible for these cards are still around to explain to us what they might have had in mind.
We begin by with a card that predicted that we would be able to enjoy concerts and operas without leaving home.  The artist could not have known about television which was not invented until the mid-1930s but the basic idea was there:  A picture is transmitted from where it is occurring and seen through a mechanism on the wall.  Unfortunately, rather than concert and opera what the folks at home are watching today are “reality” shows and football.
The next card suggested that moving sidewalks would be a feature of the future, making shopping more easy.  Although the design shown is strange, moving sidewalks have become reasonably common in shopping malls and airports, including moving staircases.  Of course, shopping has been made even easier by  outfits like Amazon that allow the shopper to make selections while sitting in front of a computer in the comfort of home. 
Submarine use for under sea excursions to allow passengers to view marine life have been common at tourist destinations for a long time.   My wife and I have taken one of these vessels during a holiday off Waikiki Beach in Oahu, Hawaii.  Unfortunately the Pacific water column gave us only one kind of fish.  Disappointing — but the experience was interesting.  Although the sub shown on the card here was an unrealistic design for an underwater craft, the artist had the right idea. 
The next card touting “roofed cities” to insure fine weather reminded me of the TV series, “Under the Dome,” a science fiction thriller that suggested a roof over a city might not be a very good idea.  The concept, however, has been carried to fruition in the many roofed shopping malls around the country.  The Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota, for example, has a gross area of 96.4 acres, enough to fit seven Yankee Stadiums inside. More than 530 stores are encompassed.  That mall would seem to qualify as a small city.
Only three years after the card above was issued, the Wright Brothers had made the first successful manmade flight in history at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. The “flying machine” at left bears only slim resemblance to early airplanes.  The other craft are purely flights of fancy.  The possibility of human flight was a source of constant fascination at the turn of the 20th Century.  The suggestion of crossing the North American continent by aircraft, indicated by the card, is borne out every minute of every hour.
At this point we leave predictions that more or less have come true and move into the realm of ideas that might have seemed logical at the time but proved to be problematic.  The first, above, was prevention of drought through rain-making.   The rain-making machine dwarfs the humans standing beside it.  How it would have worked is open to speculation. In 1892, a Washington, D.C. lawyer got Congress to give him $10,000 to conduct rain making experiments in Texas using balloons rigged with explosives, thinking that loud noises would produce rain. It did not work.  Perhaps the machine shown here was to make even louder noises.  Modern rainmaking attempts have proved similarly fruitless.  Droughts continue.
Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen was a German physicist, who, on 8 November 1895, produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range that became known as X-rays and Roentgen rays, an achievement that earned him a Nobel Prize in Physics in 190l.  The discovery caught the imagination of people worldwide and was forecast for many uses.  The one shown on the card above was in police work.  A policeman of the future, curiously dressed like a Chinese scholar, was sending X-rays through a wall, allowing him to catch two bank robbers attempting to crack the vault.
 
 A third prediction of the dubious kind was “Cruisers evading an enemy.”  It is true that amphibious vehicles of various kinds have become standard in the ordinance of nations.  I have ridden in a “Duck,” (DUKW), a World War II amphibious truck for transporting goods and troops over land and water and crossing beaches in amphibious attacks.  After the war they were used in places like the Wisconsin Dells to haul tourists.  The Duck, however, is far smaller and more mobile than a battleship.  As for avoiding an enemy, the ship would have been more vulnerable to their guns on land than on the sea.
It has been said the invention of the balloon struck the populace of the 19th Century “like a thunderbolt.” (See my post of November 25, 2012.)  This fascination continued through the 1800s, even as the limitations of balloon travel became evident.  None of this seems to have touch the creator of “One Hundred Years Hence.”  Even with the invention of the airplane only months away, the artist has created a scene in which lighter-than-air craft fill the sky.
We have entered the realm of the absurd, as demonstrated again by a trade card that purports to foresee a time when bridges and ferry boats will be dispensable.  People apparently would be able to cross rivers buoyed by their individual balloons.   One chap is riding a unicycle with a water wheel attachment.  The illustration is fantasy, not futurism.
The final image is equally bizarre.  Here we are shown two steam engines towing an entire block of buildings, apparently from place to place.  The caption adds to the puzzle, declaring “City Improvements up to date.”  The card, however, imagines a horse and wagon taking items from place to place, even though motorized vehicles were coming into common use.  So much for the predictive value of  “One Hundred Years Hence.”
This set of trade demonstrates vividly how precarious it is to try to figure out the future from a century away.  In our own time the fascination with “futurism” seems to have ebbed away significantly.  It may be so because the future of the planet appears to hold less promise and more problems, such as those brought about by global warming, air and water pollution, and global pandemics like Ebola and HIV-AIDS.